From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RESENDING] [PATCH 07/22] ASoC: Ux500: Initialise PCM from MSP probe rather than as a device Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:58:39 +0900 Message-ID: <20121123015838.GH4385@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1344527268-5964-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1344527268-5964-8-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120919133343.GH25694@gmail.com> <505ADBE6.6080509@stericsson.com> <20120920125259.GA2755@gmail.com> <20121122140540.GA10986@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cDtQGJ/EJIRf/Cpq" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121122140540.GA10986@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Ola Lilja , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Linus WALLEIJ , "arnd@arndb.de" , STEricsson_nomadik_linux List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --cDtQGJ/EJIRf/Cpq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Can we have some closure on this patch please, as it's blocking the > > > > patch-set? I'm fairly sure the patch is doing the correct thing, as > > > > seconded by Mark. > > > I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. W= e have > > > "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP I2= S-block is > > > not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at= the same time. > > > Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on = the > > > platform_name instead? > > There are other drivers which do this already.=20 > > I don't think it's an issue to do this. > Has anyone had any more bright ideas on how we might handle this? > The device is still being handled in platform code and I'm desperate > to get it out of there. Why do we need any ideas? Just implement it already. --cDtQGJ/EJIRf/Cpq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQrtgfAAoJELSic+t+oim9sdAP/3V7ir3NK4SmTh4DVdndL9z2 Jdfp3PRQ/Xtrw+D0AlWWITcaLUMotlQ826rlp2KTaKSIfF/tgBu8v8ZHbCAHH52f GgcA86BdFqfPImBIWn0I9O593LCi9jUZSGBiWel4ImpoRSasS4Lcf/T5Nl28cKff 24Ul+9k46kp0/muVpZbv9IiWUm9T5PKSjHuOQsNDt0uXZqqk+iA53Rg8h40Ho5BG P70rVbo4Br9s7WSjwxTt0KtoAxyD0OnzwKndt6M/A0CClcRdRhcgtgB9vOOlaApM xdXFwK8FgsEcjVBrsDQadaYuh0WpuBTrBHVplpU5xeIPg7pdrUviPe4c/3tEMGXA cHwGRdfDezX6sqPwnUQLA2dRGu3Hgi4CKLdiMFVnoV81POo6K3Z5uztocFgdP+Se 4X9UTkkDA+DSH4iOKLio0U4q0MlqbUMzXn5VquRKZFWkp9yw8a6Gyj3wIOBXn7A7 wXko2cx+Uyeqtam8UQ0uyWaRu14xONXF21BQPSo+3z1u8/J4T8hEv2oZORlDRRxJ 0z7/aEIs/yfaOpYkulRRnswrYlDYI6WKrJXpgHq9HpGIlF36yan2OV81O0yEE1Qg On1Raxoc7XT7bNI8BIaJtOQkrPxS3+sXIXQJPeNIVT8fx8FGkoyHDxhaeBQ605x7 tfEkllma9PdJtx29HeZR =6UW0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cDtQGJ/EJIRf/Cpq--