From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sound/soc/soc-core.c: drop kfree of devm_kzalloc's data Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:09:28 +0900 Message-ID: <20121210070927.GK10927@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1354989680-25794-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <20121210052334.GI10927@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358D52602AE for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:09:35 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Julia Lawall Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthias@kaehlcke.net, Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:10:16AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > Sorry, I just resent the patch as is. 1 and 2 were I guess applied, > because I odn't findthe problem any more. It looks like this is what happened the first time round as well - I only got patch 3 but it was flagged as part of a three patch series. Please don't do things like this, it makes the patch look like part of a series which has already been applied but didn't get deleted when it's sitting in an inbox.