From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ASoC: Add support for virtual switch controls Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:22:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20130111152202.GE20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1357833977-3682-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <1357833977-3682-2-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20130111121912.GY20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50F007DF.9000606@metafoo.de> <20130111124535.GZ20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50F00BF1.6090702@metafoo.de> <20130111135754.GB20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50F02A51.3010108@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1745427969663828214==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50F02A51.3010108-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces-ZG0+EudsQA8dtHy/vicBwGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Errors-To: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces-ZG0+EudsQA8dtHy/vicBwGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: uclinux-dist-devel-ZG0+EudsQA8dtHy/vicBwGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============1745427969663828214== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu" Content-Disposition: inline --8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > What do you mean by 'separate'? Maybe this is was causes the confusion. Do > you mean a separate DAPM control, like DAPM_SWITCH? That's not what the > patch does it creates a virtual kcontrol, which can be used to control a > mixers input. It's the pendant to SOC_DAPM_ENUM_VIRT not to The issue I'm seeing is that it sounds like this isn't joined up with the mute control (as it's a virtual control). > SND_SOC_DAPM_VIRT_MUX. I realize that the commit message may have been a bit > ambiguous in that regard. It's the virtual bit that's concerning me here so I don't think that's really it. --8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ8C4AAAoJELSic+t+oim9KhIP/1uuac5pbfR7/p6zIP0G/yWI Kck0lN5mOsP1Q+Va8b/We30wuIRK4aN4R5wvaSCQhBAs7KrhNjulO8BgoSpSb0FH rI+8rWC2JUZzQamlWMTu94woerEVRmPZ9lD0pBy5h9qJgMsxB8Munfyrc8P3KRfX appp6PJbXeecFpbk+Ac5su4iepgQ3szNizoOmlQQTzIMYSOCv1VS52tr3h534JnF s/pWMVz9Cp57HToSboHO8qIl3W9qvgCxWzKmW16yO4Y2GF8ADxOShee4P7+KgkYK 2h2uB7LUBUNZ1yJIedota6Uwn/Vfb1F3nSmiPe9ldl8jfvYenNZmX1/J8JqhK9x+ gFQ4xE+1WxVlQl6y8abCa3gIkYjV33gjyY66NieQuygiudcjRUo5vNQKPxT8uQcV 6SZcni4xdJ3O3+kBR79Qlq2/g98eXvekIN3z64cUMRIrIbZXVBkqietHLUGR2UE/ doBaUZTD5meQpiJMeQDFvmV8xqgLuV+PX/hJALfOtgGpiBSUTYiChJmjCfeIcmc0 QV9sdvjmVa8FbVJ5pcME9wub09UI3fMdqLpRMk5HIGSrvMrF2JDZQNZjH+hGmBC+ dUUrK0LI+pZhaoqp3gW1g4TfsDU4PIEkLhQD3vZ8Pq9caM25094rULmkexm5XFEl 4Yaw90t4RM84801EvkuP =vX6b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu-- --===============1745427969663828214== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Uclinux-dist-devel mailing list Uclinux-dist-devel-ZG0+EudsQA8dtHy/vicBwGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dist-devel --===============1745427969663828214==--