alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Omair M. Abdullah" <omair.m.abdullah@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Ramesh Babu <ramesh.babu@linux.intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, vinod.koul@linux.intel.com,
	vaibhav.agarwal@intel.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	Omair Mohammed Abdullah <omair.m.abdullah@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Jack: add configurable option for irq_flag
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:25:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218125516.GC23031@oma-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130217173015.GD1583@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:07:25PM +0530, Omair M. Abdullah wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:17:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > It sounds like all you're looking for here is a better debounce
> > > algorithm, for example one that delays for a bit then starts polling the
> > > GPIO state at a higher rate and declares a result when the GPIO state
> > > doesn't change for a few polls.
> 
> > We are using a polling mechanism in our system to check the jack state a few
> > times. But what we observed is that we always get a bounce.
> 
> If you're already doing that then this is at best redundant and at worst
> will make things worse if you do happen to hit a case where you don't
> see any bounce for some reason.
> 
> > Also, we do have a system where we are using the snd_soc_jack_gpio code for a
> > codec interrupt through a GPIO line, like Ramesh mentioned - even if it is just
> > for re-using the software debounce mechanism. In such cases, the interrupt would
> > be triggered on one edge only. Maybe that is not the original intent the of that
> > code?
> 
> What you're describing does not sound at all sane, the GPIO jack code is
> there for managing GPIO jacks not for providing a generic debounce
> mechanism for interrupts.  I'm not sure how you'd actually go about
> doing this...
If you have the codec interrupt line which is connected to the SoC through a
GPIO then this is possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-18 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-12  5:37 [PATCH] ASoC: Jack: add configurable option for irq_flag Omair Mohammed Abdullah
2013-02-12 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2013-02-13  5:39   ` Ramesh Babu
2013-02-13 13:19     ` Mark Brown
2013-02-15  7:10       ` Omair M. Abdullah
2013-02-15 12:17         ` Mark Brown
2013-02-17  6:37           ` Omair M. Abdullah
2013-02-17 18:11             ` Mark Brown
2013-02-18 12:55               ` Omair M. Abdullah [this message]
2013-02-18 13:29                 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130218125516.GC23031@oma-dev \
    --to=omair.m.abdullah@intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=omair.m.abdullah@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ramesh.babu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vaibhav.agarwal@intel.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).