From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: RFC: support for 12 & 24Khz Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:54:07 +0530 Message-ID: <20130728122407.GC1986@intel.com> References: <20130724172640.GE18642@intel.com> <51F0CAC0.9090702@ladisch.de> <20130725154501.GN18642@intel.com> <20130726060908.GA1986@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C45261736 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:02:59 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: pierre-louis.bossart@linux.jf.intel.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Clemens Ladisch List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:09:09AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Relying only on SNDRV_PCM_RATE_* bits doesn't scale. > What if more other rates are needed at the next time? Agreed, this is my thinking as well. Remove the usage of macro and use raw rate values... ~Vinod --