From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Jordan Subject: Request for information Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:18:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20130906221836.50bae68e@mach1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f46.google.com (mail-qe0-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358F8261ADA for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 04:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x7so2139432qeu.33 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:18:39 -0700 (PDT) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hello, I am developing a driver for the PCM3168A. We have created an expansion board with the codec, op-amp buffers, etc. which is designed to connect to the audio expansion connector on an OMAPL138 EXPKIT from LogicPD. I have the rough draft of the pcm3168a.c and pcm3168a.h. Looking through the code, I see that the DA850 is "hard-wired" in the code to expect the TLV320AIC3106, which is the on-board codec on the kit. My question is, would it be proper for me to create entries in davinci-evm.c, mach-types.h, etc. in order to provide a way to register this new driver? Or is there a different way I should proceed? I'll be modifying my code base for testing purposes, but when it comes time for submission, I would like to know the proper way to handle this. Thank you, Michael