From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: extend dapm kcontrol to support runtime route update Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:21:16 +0530 Message-ID: <20131215135116.GR29580@intel.com> References: <1386835619-18070-1-git-send-email-nhcao@marvell.com> <20131212104347.GH11044@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3551985920273718310==" Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1DE261AED for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:50:04 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20131212104347.GH11044@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , Nenghua Cao , Henry zhao , Yacine Belkadi , cxie4@marvell.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============3551985920273718310== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ALfTUftag+2gvp1h" Content-Disposition: inline --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:43:47AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:06:59PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: > > From: nhcao > >=20 > > DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based > > on mixer setting updates. DAPM has provided common get/put function for > > mixer/mux. But these function doesn't call soc_dpcm_runtime_update() > > func to update pcm links. This patch defines a DPCM DPCM kcontrol. For > > this control, the common get/put function will update FE to BE links > > dynamically. This patch has no impact to the current code. >=20 > Why shouldn't we just add the DPCM update to the standard controls - > what's the benefit in defining a new set of controls? Precisely my thoughts too, I think that would be a better approach! -- ~Vinod --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSrbPUAAoJEHwUBw8lI4NHwMsP/0GWTe+Wi/xeQjUqxljdCfSQ 0fCt6dMhev2M6sVRV2lYqgvFNmQrOU/xUc5flYDpdV+LxqauVEDtjwkuR83ovv8m a8UxRfC7mlIHosqov2yZYoPBj4mNyvrPucusbhr+vm9QFIp1nasHO7LV7w1WvZ9N 2fxs5yv9itpMtDZkm/LwRhW9MQ+53p2xi9eWMPfFFbcioXLH91LL9PIWpR5H9+0b R+MKFPpDakIW3cgTVDVDGf2m/S/I5nipqpJ4C/wG7lgtolLPESNpYv2kWay/s5Ss p9VGeM5/+kZcMOpOcgPBWVPGWPWgOspVF/e3TOnqLTJBhZSqJKD+qWHjTixIYrzn cLUmBHNbbIBq0kiKNzJdQBzJMAiXIwMgDpSGFfseFTKNp6+N9fJcsmnLtyHNgUlg zMsuDNksgWIf4DsFp2qvk2gg5zwvRC3DCl0B3v7CSgApveqQMLJQfHjgqZqytZaS cQjYuv+S2ScBeGeXMON/9lYq8vCluBDZPohFHlXApfcauey1f3D1rxOUHZSa2TpL K5uZdzPkcxhhh5V15DdaasAq8GZsQdI7l6U129e0jGU8sJjpdctOKlTE/TMUOcmQ 6dIqSnfTRCMIqHV3hhZq6dWc9UUEDogdYwCUSbsNhTkKi9+Hj0ebUKNXQVqrvRWX Y4nSkQnDgteo5kC7izNq =kFkw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ALfTUftag+2gvp1h-- --===============3551985920273718310== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============3551985920273718310==--