From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, lars@metafoo.de, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com,
jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com, eric.y.miao@gmail.com,
haojian.zhuang@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] Input - arizona-haptics: Fix double lock of dapm_mutex
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:28:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140218002807.GG2669@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140217192025.GB19223@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1264 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:20:26AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:51:29PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > snd_soc_dapm_sync takes the dapm_mutex internally, but we currently take
> > it externally as well. This patch fixes this.
> Hmm, from the first glance this needs to go into current release,
> however it seems that it has been broken by
> a73fb2df01866b772a48fab93401fe3edbe0b38d 2 years ago so nobody cares...
Please include plain text versions of commit message descriptions, in
this case you're referring to "ASoC: dapm: Use DAPM mutex for DAPM ops
instead of codec mutex". I expect nobody noticed in part because a lot
of use has been out of tree on older kernels and in part because the
issue is a race - there's a good chance things will work just fine
without the locking.
> Looking at the series I am not sure that this is right direction. You
> actually do want unlocked versions of snd_soc_dapm_* functions so that
> callers can take dapm mutex and then perform sequence of operations. The
> currect callers that were taking the mutex should probbaly be changed so
> that they do not drop it until they called unlocked version of
> snd_soc_dapm_sync().
That's all more work than is in scope for a bug fix though.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-18 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 16:51 [PATCH 00/15] Update locking for snd_soc_dapm_xxxx_pin functions Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 01/15] Input - arizona-haptics: Fix double lock of dapm_mutex Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 19:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-18 0:28 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-02-18 14:53 ` [alsa-devel] " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 02/15] ASoC: dapm: Add locked version of snd_soc_dapm_xxxx_pin functions Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 17:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-02-18 0:30 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-18 9:04 ` Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 03/15] ASoC: adav80x: Update locking around use of DAPM pin API Charles Keepax
2014-02-18 0:33 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 04/15] ASoC: wm5100: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-18 0:47 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-18 9:24 ` [alsa-devel] " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 05/15] ASoC: wm8962: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 06/15] ASoC: wm8994: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 07/15] ASoC: wm8996: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 08/15] ASoC: mfld_machine: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 09/15] ASoC: ams-delta: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 10/15] ASoC: omap: n810: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 11/15] ASoC: omap: rx51: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 12/15] ASoC: pxa: corgi: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 13/15] ASoC: pxa: magician: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 14/15] ASoC: pxa: spitz: " Charles Keepax
2014-02-17 16:51 ` [PATCH 15/15] ASoC: pxa: tosa: " Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140218002807.GG2669@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox