From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolin Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:21:57 +0800 Message-ID: <20140401132156.GB27586@MrMyself> References: <1396322227-482-1-git-send-email-Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> <1396322227-482-3-git-send-email-Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> <20140401120715.GR2269@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140401120715.GR2269@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@tabi.org, Li.Xiubo@freescale.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:07:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun > > on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did, > > enabling TERE but remaining FRDE disabled, even though the xrun on the > > opposite direction will not break the current stream. > > This still doesn't apply against fsl-sai (nor for-next). Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and "ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could not be applied against it as it needs the macro that's included in the patch "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag". What should I do now? Thank you, Nicolin