From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudip Mukherjee Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sound: pci: ctxfi: added reference of snd_card Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:16:05 +0530 Message-ID: <20140922084605.GD4870@sudip-PC> References: <1411315421-24138-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20140922081541.GC4870@sudip-PC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9546526517C for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r10so4002835pdi.39 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:45:41 +0530, > Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:04:53AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:33:37 +0530, > > > Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > > > added and initialized a pointer of snd_card in the struct hw to get a reference of > > > > the card in other functions > > > > > > You need to explain why this change is needed. The above text shows > > > what it'd do, but it doesn't give any explanation to convince why this > > > patch must be merged in. In this case, it's a preliminary patch for > > > the changes to convert to dev_*() later. It's the most important bit, > > > so don't forget it. > > > > > then do i mention in the commit that it is the preliminary patch for the later changes to dev_* ? > > If the purpose of this patch is so, just write what it'll be used > for. > > > i was thinking that we can get a reference of the card from other functions which are using struct hw > > is a reason by itself. > > If the purpose of this patch is rather broader, just write what it'll > be used for. > > Do you see what was missing? > understood. thanks . I hope v4 will be a better series than this . sudip > > Takashi