From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: fix dependencies for wm8962
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 13:22:34 +0100
Message-ID: <20141001122234.GX4273@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1950588.ErdGoiHh8p@wuerfel> <20140930164510.GF4273@sirena.org.uk>
 <20140930174241.GA1296@Asurada>
 <20140930230906.GQ4273@sirena.org.uk>
 <20140930232617.GA1732@Asurada>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0167561980016260729=="
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk (mezzanine.sirena.org.uk
 [106.187.55.193])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BD4260486
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed,  1 Oct 2014 14:22:45 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20140930232617.GA1732@Asurada>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org


--===============0167561980016260729==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vDrIcvfimaPJgjx+"
Content-Disposition: inline


--vDrIcvfimaPJgjx+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:26:18PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> I checked the Archive, the patch only got one version without cover
> letter. And this version only got one reply which is the Applied mail.
> I guess your earlier reply might have been swallowed somehow so I
> couldn't read it.

No, there were definitely at least two versions.

> And I think Fabio's suggestion/patch has no problem right?

That is the fix I was asking for.

--vDrIcvfimaPJgjx+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUK/IJAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQPUEH/i/Av5rEz9WXgim+/i1FjUc0
zS8bhbGv6fu+7aMc5N6TFT27+q0zo6EjtpNf/yN2UDm6Hrs4n2o/AVJVegSyZtV2
OKTkux3XioPiLh3mAmCSCv6kQyaPMVCrWWatx8SNwD6ogCZfwD2ik5YqOduIWa9S
QCmtMSFyXXcEaqPsYb+zE15WB7HqHiY0RnPq64WZmqOMQRDrc3Q0h1s5+NpgPLYK
2sm6sC+YGgVDx1U+5Md4f9HzOLCRcTzxXZhZOFx9zR9ZbROUGoD5bwg4s8CPhegq
FEKbR6dUc0fjHef2xJEvMwRCp5pxImBQvcL0DZ9NP3sCKgmOioNicg12D9Dlrcw=
=SuGh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vDrIcvfimaPJgjx+--

--===============0167561980016260729==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============0167561980016260729==--