Re: Intel SST on a Bay Trail tablet

[Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:20:46 +0530
> Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:46:13PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:06:27PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> [...]
> > > > 
> > > > Which makes me thinking how does those strings describe the SSP port
> > > > setup? E.g. do they reflect what port is actually used or could it
> > > > be possible that those are just driver strings but firmware could
> > > > have been tuned for SSP0? If I looked at earlier right, Teclast has
> > > > the low pin-count Baytrail without SSP2 but I'm not sure about that.
> > > The FW doesnt provide way to changes ports from driver in this, so this
> > > doesnt mean much. If we are sure it is not ssp2, I can provide ssp1 fw for
> > > test
> > I ahve pushed latest BYT version we have as well as added binary for second
> > SSP port. Please give it a try:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=byt&id=28ff420dd33ec299217bad7d526ff3bfd163b551
> > 
> 
> Thanks Vinod, but I see these are in the ELF format, and the mainline
> driver does not support this format, at least the last time I checked it
> didn't.
My bad, updated the patch now with right format

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=byt

-- 
~Vinod