From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: Intel SST on a Bay Trail tablet Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:17:17 +0530 Message-ID: <20150625164717.GU19530@localhost> References: <20150223183913.fb262011d6300425da7f34be@ao2.it> <20150303151621.c6fc3cfa308aed62484b87a0@ao2.it> <54F5CB3D.7020100@linux.intel.com> <20150304170218.7b397993ce670902800109f1@ao2.it> <20150403153414.b8de8df914664d7d7967120c@ao2.it> <20150414150236.3e8288307124a43941ab94f7@ao2.it> <552D1EE3.6090707@linux.intel.com> <20150624101613.GK19530@localhost> <20150625055046.GT19530@localhost> <20150625122125.72a1d72b4d3aa886d68fa3eb@ao2.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85390260676 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:45:59 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150625122125.72a1d72b4d3aa886d68fa3eb@ao2.it> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Antonio Ospite Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mika Westerberg , Ramesh Babu K V , Omair Mohammed Abdullah , Harsha Priya , Jarkko Nikula , "Subhransu S. Prusty" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:20:46 +0530 > Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:46:13PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:06:27PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > [...] > > > > > > > > Which makes me thinking how does those strings describe the SSP port > > > > setup? E.g. do they reflect what port is actually used or could it > > > > be possible that those are just driver strings but firmware could > > > > have been tuned for SSP0? If I looked at earlier right, Teclast has > > > > the low pin-count Baytrail without SSP2 but I'm not sure about that. > > > The FW doesnt provide way to changes ports from driver in this, so this > > > doesnt mean much. If we are sure it is not ssp2, I can provide ssp1 fw for > > > test > > I ahve pushed latest BYT version we have as well as added binary for second > > SSP port. Please give it a try: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=byt&id=28ff420dd33ec299217bad7d526ff3bfd163b551 > > > > Thanks Vinod, but I see these are in the ELF format, and the mainline > driver does not support this format, at least the last time I checked it > didn't. My bad, updated the patch now with right format https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/firmware.git/commit/?h=byt -- ~Vinod