From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, patches.audio@intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
"Subhransu S. Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] ASoC: Intel: Reorganize the common dsp structure
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:02:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709043239.GG836@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150708183833.GA11162@sirena.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 970 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 07:38:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 04:04:04PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > From: "Subhransu S. Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>
> >
> > We will add SKL platform data. So organizing common and platform
> > specific data helps.
>
> > struct sst_dsp {
> >
> > + /* Shared for all platforms */
> > +
> > /* runtime */
> > struct sst_dsp_device *sst_dev;
> > spinlock_t spinlock; /* IPC locking */
> > @@ -268,10 +270,6 @@ struct sst_dsp {
> > int irq;
> > u32 id;
> >
> > - /* list of free and used ADSP memory blocks */
> > - struct list_head used_block_list;
> > - struct list_head free_block_list;
> > -
>
> Perhaps a union might start to make sense at some point?
Initially we did start with a union but Liam didn't like another indirection.
Anyway since not a bunch a members are getting added here, this should be
okay
Liam you want to add here...
--
~Vinod
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-03 10:34 [PATCH v2 0/6] ASoC: Intel: Sklyake - add IPC routines Vinod Koul
2015-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ASoC: Intel: Add helper to poll register for DSP status Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 18:36 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-09 4:27 ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-09 10:48 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-09 10:53 ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ASoC: Intel: Define SKL ADSP IPC and general purpose registers Vinod Koul
2015-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ASoC: Intel: Reorganize the common dsp structure Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 18:38 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-09 4:32 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2015-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ASoC: Intel: Add helper to update register bits with attr RWC Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 18:47 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-09 4:44 ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ASoC: Intel: Add Skylake IPC library Vinod Koul
2015-07-08 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2015-07-09 5:26 ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-09 13:18 ` Vinod Koul
2015-07-03 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ASoC: Intel: Add DSP init and boot up functionality for SKL Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150709043239.GG836@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=patches.audio@intel.com \
--cc=subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox