From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tegra: Convert to managed resources Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:15:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20150818051555.GG10748@sirena.org.uk> References: <20150813072920.GA17181@localhost> <20150817204751.GD10748@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rDr66iUNdD59gODe" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Vaishali Thakkar Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Wolfram Sang , "alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --rDr66iUNdD59gODe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:15:35AM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > I think yes may be code was good before this. But devm_clk_put part should work > fine as call of it is before PM stuff. So, can I send a patch > reverting the change > of component part or do you want me to send a patch reverting whole change? Just fixing the problematic part is fine. --rDr66iUNdD59gODe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV0r+KAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQeYsH/ROZ7tusJahnwHEEbgIqvvXn Lkz1aSX935eYCQQfFnvnXD9B/2F9cZ1g13KUXSdyqd5gfbKXgSdbxFbLQm0HbZBD CG5KrSTN1729feAl/Mq6iqmFYfUxf/85ts3RVtjZQUy3YR3ynBlOZymJNh+hFUHa 7ofBeGjsg1TdsfrhWEVXhF6mePgMNCXNOq8140dciPEUgXQsj41Cyhz8HzM2mAbN S2o8XBndPST0eEcYg0/OmRBYBUQZ7drJsMpvpiOWEGoD7+Vw7z0HrFbNUN7ah/ff Vs5c9zBrj+yRzFmOq1SW30XxifGd4VGjCydYpjjAE/6IbDxQeLkxFZgRXLMlYQU= =c/zY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rDr66iUNdD59gODe--