From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudip Mukherjee Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: wm0010: disable regulator on error Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:12:05 +0530 Message-ID: <20150918124205.GA28272@sudip-pc> References: <1442572341-28201-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20150918113412.GF7694@ck-lbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150918113412.GF7694@ck-lbox> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Charles Keepax Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:34:12PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:02:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > We have done regulator_bulk_enable() while booting the DSP but on the > > error exit path we have not disbled it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > > --- > > sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c > > index 8434d45..79a7cd3 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c > > @@ -739,8 +739,6 @@ static int wm0010_boot(struct snd_soc_codec *codec) > > abort: > > /* Put the chip back into reset */ > > wm0010_halt(codec); > > - mutex_unlock(&wm0010->lock); > > - return ret; > > Does wm0010_halt not disable the regulators? oops, yes, it does. Sorry I should have seen it before posting. patch 2/3 and 3/3 will still apply even if this 1/3 is not applied. Should I send a v2 leaving out this patch or is it ok to discard this patch while applying? regards sudip