From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolin Chen Subject: Re: fsl_ssi.c: Getting channel slips with fsl_ssi.c in TDM (network) mode. Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:22:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20151102172247.GA4068@Asurada-CZ80> References: <20151029171936.GA3492@Asurada-CZ80> <20151029192816.GA43706@Asurada-CZ80> <20151029224713.GA44369@Asurada-CZ80> <20151030012934.GA5456@Asurada-GSX> <20151031014845.GB3525@Asurada-CZ80> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C54B2618ED for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:22:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so30187637pab.0 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:22:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Caleb Crome Cc: Fabio Estevam , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Markus Pargmann , "arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com" , Roberto Fichera , "shawn.guo@linaro.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:22:54AM -0700, Caleb Crome wrote: > > But I would like to see how the change will be after merging the > > simultaneous TE/RE work around. > > I'm not sure I understand this statement. What's the simultaneous > TE/RE work around? It appears that the trigger function *only* does > either one or the other, and not simultaneously. Is there a patch in > the works to make tx/rx happen simultaneously? I mean those problems Arnaud mentioned.