From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Keepax Subject: Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:46:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20151123114637.GI18889@ck-lbox> References: <20151114123931.GW12392@sirena.org.uk> <20151114175915.GA20429@amd> <20151114184940.GY12392@sirena.org.uk> <20151114211633.GE20429@amd> <20151116141142.GE18889@ck-lbox> <20151122065140.GC26074@amd> <20151123081857.GF3098@x1> <20151123101145.GA1452@amd> <1448274322.3536.45.camel@rf-debian.wolfsonmicro.main> <20151123113041.GG1929@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com (mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com [67.231.152.168]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A372650DB for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:02:35 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151123113041.GG1929@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, tiwai@suse.de, Richard Fitzgerald , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, Pavel Machek , Lee Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:30:41AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:25:22AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:11 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > That's what I'm saying. It is good to know who is the person of > > > authority, as you can't tell from the From: address. > > > It's unreasonable to expect that one member of the Cirrus software team > > has the time to answer every inquiry about our drivers and never goes on > > vacation, or that there's only one person who is an authority about the > > drivers. There's a mailing list for a reason. > > It's perfectly OK to list multiple people - look at how other companies > handle this, there's usually two or three people listed. I don't really object to sticking a few people in here if the general feeling is that would be better, but personally I didn't see any problem with the current setup. Shall I do a patch to add a few of us in here? Thanks, Charles