From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][REBASE] ASoC: simple-card: add parse_clk / parse_dai Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:32:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20160808103234.GD10383@sirena.org.uk> References: <878tw7ajwu.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jSXJDi5r/aeatSyx" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tw7ajwu.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Linux-ALSA , Liam Girdwood , Simon , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --jSXJDi5r/aeatSyx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 05:58:34AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > These are rebase version patches for parse_clk / parse_dai on simple utiles. > I think today's topic/simple is missing [1/7] patch, but have [2/7] [3/7]. > Because of this, it has bulid error, and you can't apply [4/7]. Please don't resend already applied patches. > These patches add new functions on utils.c, and I noticed that > it will have conflict with fix/simple branch. > Because of these reasons, I think you want to redo topic/simple branch (?). > These patches are based on fix/simple branch. No, I'm not rebasing. I can merge the fix branch into the main branch. --jSXJDi5r/aeatSyx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXqFksAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQAn4H/3/fc6Hg9cejdjyVz1g6S+/s iLHG9zD4wLnCHFeFfJlrhKKzPNbJBxlbFzNhpE9V0URK9zOu4GkPyIOZSyNAs/U6 nQGAN7TYvfZtcIgXczKekMjKVnCRpm6fz9MD7/jeWfQa32TwqZXk2gNHkPNipnlp A5oSphH8/muUP4+8XjGDkOW5Eda5tUw3zOjPnkPnRlplF6iE7z+QW0H7vcfmdNdf K9vh7g/VD0wOhom0Xu9EarUNbQgKU1Wfxepk3exM96wK172BQyz3kek/n/JL2A+q kdYL2CKdJ8e8MIHFtFpgRdefyii++4/kuxLbRfSJV7enGPI9vziu/LHHZJr1Alg= =XUML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jSXJDi5r/aeatSyx--