From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: locking looks odd
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:03:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160816210322.GD4466@var.home> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]
Hello,
We are having odd issues with libasound 1.1.2 which we didn't have with
libasound 1.1.1, more precisely
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833950
so I'm having a look at the locking API introduced in 1.1.2, and there
are some oddities:
- snd_pcm_new seems to initialize pcm->thread_safe to 0 by default, this
does not seem safe. The attached patch initializes it to 1, which
fixes the bug in our tests.
- snd_pcm_hw_open_fd forces it to 1, thus ignoring what snd_pcm_new set.
- one can find both __snd_pcm_lock and snd_pcm_lock functions, what is
the expected difference between them?
- __snd_pcm_lock takes locks when thread_safe >= 0, while snd_pcm_lock
takes locks when thread_safe == 0, this looks really odd.
- libasound could just not link against libpthread,
pthread_mutex_lock/unlock are already provided as empty stubs by libc,
the overhead will thus only be hit when the application links against
libpthread (libasound will then properly use pthread locks).
Samuel
[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 337 bytes --]
--- ./src/pcm/pcm.c.orig 2016-08-10 19:39:59.881564371 +0200
+++ ./src/pcm/pcm.c 2016-08-10 19:40:04.211539997 +0200
@@ -2544,6 +2544,7 @@
pcm->fast_op_arg = pcm;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcm->async_handlers);
#ifdef THREAD_SAFE_API
+ pcm->thread_safe = 1;
pthread_mutex_init(&pcm->lock, NULL);
{
static int default_thread_safe = -1;
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-16 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-16 21:03 Samuel Thibault [this message]
2016-08-17 12:41 ` locking looks odd Takashi Sakamoto
2016-08-17 17:46 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2016-08-20 12:12 ` Samuel Thibault
2016-08-22 12:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-26 19:02 ` Samuel Thibault
2016-08-30 14:20 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-30 15:54 ` Alan Horstmann
2016-08-30 16:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-22 11:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-09-01 6:27 ` David Henningsson
2016-09-01 8:12 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160816210322.GD4466@var.home \
--to=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).