From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: locking looks odd Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:02:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20160826190212.GR5165@var> References: <20160816210322.GD4466@var.home> <0fec7ab2-f72f-a27a-e82b-58642836db88@perex.cz> <20160820121205.GK4252@var.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr (hera.aquilenet.fr [141.255.128.1]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEAC267BF4 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:02:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160820121205.GK4252@var.home> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Samuel Thibault, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 14:12:05 +0200, wrote: > I'd just like to check something: do we agree that libasound must be > thread-safe by default (otherwise it breaks the application assumption > that it's thread-safe)? If so, then there are thread-safety bugs: Ok, now with the discussion on the portaudio list starting at https://lists.columbia.edu/pipermail/portaudio/2016-August/000599.html it seems the issue was in portaudio, which was hit by the locking behavior change. Samuel