From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, vinod.koul@intel.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
clemens@ladisch.de, broonie@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: core: mark SND_SOC_BYTES_EXT as deprecated"
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:21:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915142148.GR21682@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473947149-6663-1-git-send-email-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:45:49PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> SND_SOC_BYTES_TLV brings confusions to user land because it doesn't follow
> to a protocol of ctl and tlv operation. At least, this macro and related
> kernel APIs include two misunderstandings:
> - 'struct snd_ctl_elem_info.count' can also represent the length of TLV
> packet paylaod, snd_soc_bytes_info_ext() performs in this way.
> - 'struct snd_ctl_tlv.tlv' can include arbitrary data regardless of TLV
> packet structure, snd_soc_bytes_tlv_callback() performs in this way.
>
> In a policy of kernel land development, it's quite worse to break protocols
> for applications. Therefore, developers are discouraged to use these kernel
> APIs.
>
> In the first place, SND_SOC_BYTES_TLV was added to satisfy a request of
> developers who need to add control elements which transfer data larger than
> the size which 'struct snd_ctl_elem_value' can represent; e.g. over 512
> bytes. However, as long as the size is less than the size; e.g. 512 bytes,
> SND_SOC_BYTES_EXT is still available. Although there is actually the
> limitation of maximum data size, it's better to use this API for stable
> application interface till better alternative ways are implemented in
> future.
>
> For these reasons, this commit reverts the previous commit which lead
> developers to the worse behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
> ---
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Yeah would be better to use normal controls for <512 bytes, so
this looks good to me.
Although you might want to resend using Mark's kernel.org address
as I imagine he would be the one to apply the change and that is
the address he normally uses for patches.
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 13:45 [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: core: mark SND_SOC_BYTES_EXT as deprecated" Takashi Sakamoto
2016-09-15 14:21 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2016-09-15 14:41 ` Takashi Sakamoto
2016-09-15 14:54 ` Mark Brown
2016-09-15 22:29 ` Takashi Sakamoto
2016-09-15 23:26 ` Takashi Sakamoto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-15 23:06 Takashi Sakamoto
2016-09-16 10:52 ` Mark Brown
2016-09-16 13:21 ` Takashi Sakamoto
2016-09-16 14:11 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915142148.GR21682@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@linaro.org \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).