From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add platform clock for BayTrail platforms Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:00:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20170121000028.GG20800@codeaurora.org> References: <1484690270-28425-1-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <1484736630.2133.184.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1484736630.2133.184.camel@linux.intel.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart , Thomas Gleixner , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Irina Tirdea , Michael Turquette , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Mark Brown , "H . Peter Anvin" , Len Brown , Vinod Koul List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 01/18, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 15:57 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > These patches specifically enable the audio MCLK required by Baytrail > > CR devices. It is the remaining part of a bigger set of patches > > (already merged in Mark Brown's tree) that enable sound for Baytrail > > CR > > devices (especially Asus T100TAF) [1]. They include the clock driver > > and clock enabling in the pmc_atom code (along with moving of the > > non-architectural pmc_atom driver code into drivers/platform/x86 as > > suggested by Thomas Gleixner [2]). This move includes a new header in > > include/linux/platform_data/x86/. While there is an agreement that the > > definitions for PMC clocks are not really platform data this location > > is seen as a good-enough compromise with an agreement between Darren > > Hart and Andy Shevchenko [3] > > > > [1] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-August/1 > > 11704.html > > [2] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-October/ > > 113936.html > > [3] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December > > /115892.html > > > > Stephen, I see no issues with the patches. If you want to push them > through your tree, take a tag from PDx86 subsystem point of view: Does PDx86 == platform device x86? I can provide a stable branch in clk tree for platform tree, or platform x86 maintainer can ack the platform/x86 patches and I can take the whole batch through clk tree. > > Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project