From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Keepax Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: imx-wm8962: Fix codec_clk cleanup Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:53:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20170328115306.GR6986@localhost.localdomain> References: <1490691532-2086-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> <1490691532-2086-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> <20170328092103.GQ6986@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com (mx0a-001ae601.pphosted.com [67.231.149.25]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C3026648D for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:52:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Daniel Baluta Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , Timur Tabi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nicolin Chen , Mark Brown , fabio.estevam@nxp.com, Daniel Baluta List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:47:04PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Charles Keepax > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:58:52AM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > >> Resource managed devm_clk_get only works with platform's device dev. > >> > > > > I feel like this could use an explaination of why not using devm > > is the correct fix, rather than just using the platform device > > for the call. Its not obvious to me, that using the platform > > device would be an issue. > > Hi Charles, > > I see where the confusion comes from :) and I thought the explanation > is obvious from the code, see inline comments. > > Would an explanation like the one below, work better? > > " We cannot use devm_clk_get with &codec_dev->dev device because > the kernel uses pdev->dev to free the managed resources, so we will end > up with a leaking codec_clk reference" > > >> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int imx_wm8962_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> goto fail; > >> } > > pdev->dev from here: > > >> > >> - codec_clk = devm_clk_get(&codec_dev->dev, NULL); > >> + codec_clk = clk_get(&codec_dev->dev, NULL); > > is different from &codec_dev->dev. > I get that they are different, I just don't get why changing from a devm_clk_get to a clk_get is a better fix than changing &codec->dev to &pdev->dev. Thanks, Charles