From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
"ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"Douglas Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Matthias Kaehlcke" <mka@chromium.org>,
naveen.m@intel.com, "Colin King" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
坂本貴史 <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
sebastien.guiriec@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 10:13:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531044342.GQ15061@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Ve2nRf5SdFUTcAPwpYSKWvG4fyHKMJUzoVcg73NQp0xYQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:06:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> > In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function
> > sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it
> > was never used. ...but a quick look at the code shows that we should
> > also be able to remove the sst_save_shim64() function and the
> > structure members we were storing data in.
> >
> > Once we delete sst_save_shim64() there are no longer any users of the
> > 'sst_shim_regs64' structure. That means we can delete it completely
> > and also avoid allocating memory for it. This saves a whopping 136
> > bytes of devm allocated memory. We also get the nice benefit of
> > avoiding an error path in the init code.
> >
> > Note that the saving code that we're removing (and the comments
> > talking about how important it is to do the save) has been around
> > since commit 336cfbb05edf ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld- add ACPI module").
>
> I like it!
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> P.S. Perhaps there are more leftovers or dead code?
Hope not :) This was due to restore not required eventually. Somehow save
was left pending.
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-30 16:51 [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used Douglas Anderson
2017-05-30 17:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-30 17:18 ` Doug Anderson
2017-05-31 4:43 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-06-06 19:05 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531044342.GQ15061@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=naveen.m@intel.com \
--cc=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sebastien.guiriec@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).