From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 10:13:43 +0530 Message-ID: <20170531044342.GQ15061@localhost> References: <20170530165130.15011-1-dianders@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7567D2668BF for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 06:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart , ALSA Development Mailing List , Douglas Anderson , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , Takashi Iwai , Matthias Kaehlcke , naveen.m@intel.com, Colin King , =?utf-8?B?5Z2C5pys6LK05Y+y?= , sebastien.guiriec@intel.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:06:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function > > sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it > > was never used. ...but a quick look at the code shows that we should > > also be able to remove the sst_save_shim64() function and the > > structure members we were storing data in. > > > > Once we delete sst_save_shim64() there are no longer any users of the > > 'sst_shim_regs64' structure. That means we can delete it completely > > and also avoid allocating memory for it. This saves a whopping 136 > > bytes of devm allocated memory. We also get the nice benefit of > > avoiding an error path in the init code. > > > > Note that the saving code that we're removing (and the comments > > talking about how important it is to do the save) has been around > > since commit 336cfbb05edf ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld- add ACPI module"). > > I like it! > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Vinod Koul > P.S. Perhaps there are more leftovers or dead code? Hope not :) This was due to restore not required eventually. Somehow save was left pending. -- ~Vinod