From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: yesanishhere@gmail.com
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com,
lgirdwood@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Resend] [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:05:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920110534.exix6dqf4la2nday@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505896116-43310-4-git-send-email-yesanishhere@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 01:28:35AM -0700, yesanishhere@gmail.com wrote:
> From: anish kumar <yesanishhere@gmail.com>
>
> Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple
> params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to
> decide which param to apply at runtime.
>
> However, in case there is only single param configuration
> then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there
> is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
>
> In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory
> allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used
> or not used based on num_param. It is better to not
> allocate memory when there is only a single configuration.
> This change is to remedy that anomaly.
>
> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <yesanishhere@gmail.com>
> ---
This does make the code look quite a bit nicer, I think there is
one small issue below.
<snip>
> +int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card,
> + const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params,
> + unsigned int num_params,
> + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source,
> + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink)
> +{
> + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template;
> + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w;
> + char *link_name;
> + int ret;
> +
> + link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s",
> + source->name, sink->name);
> + if (!link_name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> + memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template));
> + template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM;
> + template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link;
> + template.name = link_name;
> + template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event;
> + template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU |
> + SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD;
> + template.kcontrol_news = NULL;
> +
> + /* allocate memory for control, only in case of multiple configs */
> + if (num_params > 1) {
> + template.num_kcontrols = 1;
> + template.kcontrol_news =
> + snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(card,
> + link_name, params, num_params);
> + if (!template.kcontrol_news) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto outfree_link_name;
> + }
> + }
> dev_dbg(card->dev, "ASoC: adding %s widget\n", link_name);
>
> w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(&card->dapm, &template);
If we fail this call or the call to snd_soc_dapm_add_path that
follows it we don't clean up all the stuff we allocated in
snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol. We probably need to add a de-alloc
function for the error paths as well.
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-20 8:28 [Resend] [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params yesanishhere
2017-09-20 8:28 ` [Resend] [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: dapm: fix error path in snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm yesanishhere
2017-09-20 11:02 ` Charles Keepax
2017-09-20 11:42 ` Applied "ASoC: dapm: fix error path in snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-09-20 8:28 ` [Resend] [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: dapm: Refactor the code in snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm yesanishhere
2017-09-20 11:02 ` Charles Keepax
2017-09-20 8:28 ` [Resend] [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params yesanishhere
2017-09-20 11:05 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2017-09-20 8:28 ` [Resend] [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: dapm: Remove the redundant check yesanishhere
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170920110534.exix6dqf4la2nday@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yesanishhere@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).