From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH] tinycompress: clarify dual-license wording Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:28:31 +0530 Message-ID: <20171020055831.GK30097@localhost> References: <20171018181125.27538-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF51266A51 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171018181125.27538-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:11:25PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > There were reports of confusion in legal circles introduced by the wording > "tinycompress is provided under LGPL and BSD dual license" in the README. > > Clarify with the addition of the wording traditionally used for dual licenses: > > "This file is provided under a dual BSD/LGPLv2.1 license. When using or > redistributing this file, you may do so under either license" Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod