From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] soundwire: Add Master registration Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:32:14 +0530 Message-ID: <20171110050214.GM3187@localhost> References: <1508382211-3154-1-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> <1508382211-3154-4-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6921B2678A9 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 05:59:02 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: ALSA , Charles Keepax , Takashi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , plai@codeaurora.org, LKML , Pierre , patches.audio@intel.com, Mark , Sudheer Papothi , Shreyas NC , Sanyog Kale , Sagar Dharia , alan@linux.intel.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:14:16PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > > On 19/10/17 04:03, Vinod Koul wrote: > > >+/** > >+ * sdw_add_bus_master: add a bus Master instance > >+ * > >+ * @bus: bus instance > >+ * > >+ * Initializes the bus instance, read properties and create child > >+ * devices. > >+ */ > > Some of the exported functions are missing kerneldocs. > Is it something you plan to add in next version of the patcheset? I though most were, will double check to be sure. > > >+int sdw_add_bus_master(struct sdw_bus *bus) > >+{ > >+ int ret; > >+ > >+ if (!bus->dev) { > >+ pr_err("SoundWire bus has no device"); > >+ return -ENODEV; > >+ } > >+ > >+ mutex_init(&bus->bus_lock); > >+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bus->slaves); > >+ > >+ /* > >+ * SDW is an enumerable bus, but devices can be powered off. So, > >+ * they won't be able to report as present. > >+ * > >+ * Create Slave devices based on Slaves described in > >+ * the respective firmware (ACPI/DT) > >+ */ > >+ > >+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && bus->dev && ACPI_HANDLE(bus->dev)) > >+ ret = sdw_acpi_find_slaves(bus); > >+ else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && bus->dev && bus->dev->of_node) > >+ ret = sdw_of_find_slaves(bus); > >+ else > bus->dev is already checked in the start of the function, do we need to > check once again ? yes already fixed, thanks -- ~Vinod