From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI dependencies Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:23:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20171120152300.6d058999@alans-desktop> References: <20171118000202.22302-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20171118000202.22302-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171118000202.22302-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:01:57 -0600 Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > PCI/ACPI selections should not happen in Kconfig for machine drivers, > move to SOC selections. > > Add distinction between PCI and ACPI HiFi2 platforms. The PCI-based > platforms may be removed at some point since Medfield is not really > supported by anyone and there is no publicly available firmware for > Merrifield. Merrifield is (Intel secret decoder ring translation - 'Edison') I don't thionk anyone would care if Medfield and Moorestown kicked the bucket upstream however. Moorestown wouldn't make much difference code-wise as it has a 'real computer' twin (Oaktrail), but dumping the Medfield code would be IMHO fine. Alan