From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] timecounter: Make cyclecounter struct part of timecounter struct Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 07:56:05 -0800 Message-ID: <20171201155605.7c7oiq5we4n7wdum@localhost> References: <1512114454-26958-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1512114454-26958-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sagar Arun Kamble Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Chris Wilson , John Stultz , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Thomas Gleixner , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:17:34PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > There is no real need for the users of timecounters to define cyclecounter > and timecounter variables separately. Since timecounter will always be > based on cyclecounter, have cyclecounter struct as member of timecounter > struct. Could you please put the PTP maintainer onto CC? Thanks, Richard