From: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: ASoC: How to write new (atmel) driver?
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:53:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180114215349.GA16051@lenoch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180114115400.GA5867@lenoch>
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:54:00PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I've got new at91sam9g20 board with max9867 codec (*), so I wanted to get
> inspiration from other drivers in sound/soc/atmel. Indeed, there are three
> of them:
> atmel_wm8904.c
> sam9g20_wm8731.c
> sam9x5_wm8731.c
> Now, looking at sound/soc/tegra, sound/soc/mediatek, etc. most drivers seems
> to be created by copy, modify (mostly find&replace), commit. There are so many
> of them, that it is probably impossible to fix them all (consider for
> example patch bellow to be done several times for different drivers) (**)
Okay, at least for atmel drivers, I'll just sent few cleanups/fixes, not
sure about the rest. Perhaps some coccinelle scripting would help.
> So is sound/soc/generic preferred solution these days? Btw, generic drivers
> are calling of_node_put before they are done dealing with that node.
>
> And if above is preferred solution what about all those already created
> drivers? Fix them all or covert to generic one by introducing DT fixups
> for all those over the time created DT properties? At least for atmel
> drivers that seems to be doable as atmel_ssc_dai needs to be modified
> to get it work under generic framework and keeping old interface would
> needlesly complicate things - unless I miss something obvious of course :)
...and the obvious is drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c and then simple-audio-card
should do the trick.
Well, remaining question is how is SND_SOC_MAX9768 expected to be selected?
> (*) for now I wrote driver using copy&modify, but that does not seem to be
> the right solution anymore
> (**) almost two decades ago I rather wrote OSS driver for the very same
> reasons, but now OSS is gone...
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c b/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c
> index 9db08826b32a..11e2c37a2e42 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/sam9x5_wm8731.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget sam9x5_dapm_widgets[] = {
> static int sam9x5_wm8731_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> - struct device_node *codec_np, *cpu_np;
> struct snd_soc_card *card;
> struct snd_soc_dai_link *dai;
> struct sam9x5_drvdata *priv;
> @@ -122,23 +121,20 @@ static int sam9x5_wm8731_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - codec_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "atmel,audio-codec", 0);
> - if (!codec_np) {
> + dai->codec_of_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "atmel,audio-codec", 0);
> + if (!dai->codec_of_node) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "atmel,audio-codec node missing\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - dai->codec_of_node = codec_np;
> -
> - cpu_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "atmel,ssc-controller", 0);
> - if (!cpu_np) {
> + dai->cpu_of_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "atmel,ssc-controller", 0);
> + if (!dai->cpu_of_node) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "atmel,ssc-controller node missing\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> + goto out_put_codec;
> }
> - dai->cpu_of_node = cpu_np;
> - dai->platform_of_node = cpu_np;
> + dai->platform_of_node = dai->cpu_of_node;
>
> priv->ssc_id = of_alias_get_id(cpu_np, "ssc");
>
> @@ -146,12 +142,9 @@ static int sam9x5_wm8731_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret != 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set SSC %d for audio: %d\n",
> ret, priv->ssc_id);
> - goto out;
> + goto out_put_cpu;
> }
>
> - of_node_put(codec_np);
> - of_node_put(cpu_np);
> -
> ret = snd_soc_register_card(card);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Platform device allocation failed\n");
> @@ -164,6 +157,10 @@ static int sam9x5_wm8731_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> out_put_audio:
> atmel_ssc_put_audio(priv->ssc_id);
> +out_put_cpu:
> + of_node_put(dai->cpu_of_node);
> +out_put_codec:
> + of_node_put(dai->codec_of_node);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-14 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 11:54 ASoC: How to write new (atmel) driver? Ladislav Michl
2018-01-14 21:53 ` Ladislav Michl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180114215349.GA16051@lenoch \
--to=ladis@linux-mips.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox