From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:02:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20190114230255.GK11073@sirena.org.uk> References: <0660a471-3698-2059-4494-ad146518a4ed@nvidia.com> <20190109125340.GD10405@sirena.org.uk> <52f5f2cf-9260-f9c5-f73d-3c3d5debc86b@nvidia.com> <20190109141439.GE10405@sirena.org.uk> <875zuxb9uy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <871s5kqb43.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87h8efpoxh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7224673882882375101==" Return-path: Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB3E2670AC for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:03:04 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kuninori Morimoto , Marcel Ziswiler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , Matthias Reichl , Marcel Ziswiler , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============7224673882882375101== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SCOJXUq1iwCn05li" Content-Disposition: inline --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:15:42AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 11/01/2019 08:51, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > So, can you agree about these ? > > 1) Add enough information/documentation about legacy/modern style and its plan. > > 2) Add dirty pointer fixup patch as workaround > > 3) switch to modern style as much as possible > I think that Mark needs to decided on whether use your 'dirty pointer' > fix or not. I've gone ahead with Curtis' version of Morimoto-san's patch just now - hopefully that's fine for v5.0. Like we've been saying neither approach is ideal, thanks Jon and Morimoto-san for your efforts analyzing this and your proposals. --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlw9FR4ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dbawf/agRz5TjSTBnTWu+KSjrCB+C+lMhRKOffsiss0cyfbgpS+mKvdujG+ZPb 4ebTzIDaG+LZWS83jkfh9wcIWy7miQrcZ7DY5XwoFaiLp4fbkVA5lW5jId2juf4u RTy1Q2RR3WR3LxQ0RTP86a+4L9Gf3jaQm3n2NIw0k9TqKgMB89q1inAMkTNn8F0U AozHjzvy1o1P57iHFj+BTeAmfAlpqzfJ2wsadm8dyxauitp5Pa9JWepq+BZJX0g9 rw3OrFs2VKrpj6FfcVTaeyHgMSITOqcd19B+CoJoYBKP20+ogs58j71e0ndqALxw DH40p4DyPx1zi98Q5cyo6gMiJI2xAg== =JWgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li-- --===============7224673882882375101== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============7224673882882375101==--