From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF10C10F27 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 085B320828 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="UsmrPtI0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 085B320828 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5136F1675; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:54:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 5136F1675 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1583772913; bh=kU/9LkE7mPZ4GC+4dMcpbDDP/D1tGYyGtfXn/1zliAk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=UsmrPtI0MbNUX9vvn3WRJeGp1eXGbBD3etceKfX8APycsFfsIZSksz4SLMgVOrHo3 bZbwxBgcCBDlsG6RpK8rrvMbRb2WDitXA9WhR3xh0C+R0OccadhcJDKQuccLfHtXd1 K3AsmAme3GGOeaWFt/6jzzhsVBfzX0KEH6x6dK6Q= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F6FF801EB; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:54:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 1777EF801F7; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:54:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907C9F801A3 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:54:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 907C9F801A3 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E194A1FB; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63D1A3F534; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:54:13 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Cezary Rojewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Fix HDaudio and Dmic Message-ID: <20200309165413.GH4101@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200305145314.32579-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> <9d53337b-b02b-efd7-790e-c3db18562346@linux.intel.com> <20200309113844.GA4101@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8sldprk+5E/pDEv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Above all things, reverence yourself. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.com, Pierre-Louis Bossart , lgirdwood@gmail.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:02:25PM +0100, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > Mark, what's your take on backporting these to 4.19 LTS? Do we abandon the > subject and "just" merge (once reviewed/ approved) into 5.5? I believe > addressing all the issues mentioned on 4.19 is important. I didn't actually look at the patches since by the time I went to look at them it was clear that there was going to be a new version. Pierre was saying that they added new functionality which would generally not be suitable. See Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst for the official rules. --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl5mdLUACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DZ2gf/Zm6kaB1CqHuqxzdUL5bhxEtvxA/j13lodjtM70ALUUct6nd1q9AQwQHl PGUll0xtrca4ftLBZFmbCK0ju+935msvPXIRX7Z1HwFeWkizR4whusEEyJtUYnI7 JRx4qcf4pJvB48os4ywrmUeEfqjb+J48WNbXGzkdqOsEz6ViaSZ3L+MtW3ovNbAq A5IeCnGdxwSXDL7s88ZMZ85/4YRZh7EsnE1Bj6NN7e5luDDhdfsQbLUoeohS2ktx 2Z3pWPcDlgfoBHlX3Ku5uZmCHPW0+rxqDgyQSqb4Bc6i0mt7y+i7iWEYDcHYR+9K J1qaRE7MRpDNO7KuzJD8/Mi6Dmm1mQ== =L2tP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8sldprk+5E/pDEv--