From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545C1C4332E for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E172078A for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="CMRZf94H"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oHBwIXyT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D8E172078A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2313386F; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:16:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 2313386F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1584965826; bh=jCOWRh42vHKRmuLejlk3NOJX2vnfeEJTZUiki6Qd37I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=CMRZf94HXE2KrrgifQzxdjo4siz8X7FeWfOZEhmS5NQhpC6PUSMQATncojcdhmeA6 3Yxxx1B7VaKCqmka0vGXjyoZbVGKozTpkTlJRs2V84VYEVPpNXRFncFxGx9FoGE8qC 0oYDOtwsw8cfAvpMzmF8uXWzYi9KlcTc7E0F/qgc= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA39F800F6; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:16:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id C5548F800F6; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:16:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB425F800F6 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:16:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz DB425F800F6 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oHBwIXyT" Received: from localhost (unknown [122.178.205.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B33B92078B; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:16:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584965765; bh=jCOWRh42vHKRmuLejlk3NOJX2vnfeEJTZUiki6Qd37I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oHBwIXyT+XFi4LgqRYZP+1b1FgpZ6QuEpEq3rOBoebxb+yPg5AjdQZXLn3SNgH5U9 4sXay+DVxIVNhgy44uw9EhRIx3MgBCLlScZHpwW22fKI6DgMOpLlQGkotJvJNO2ZQO tVTQvsd5xQcvW44VLPsdwtjNVuz9SaX9rG+SQOB4= Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:46:01 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: bus_type: add master_device/driver support Message-ID: <20200323121601.GJ72691@vkoul-mobl> References: <20200306050115.GC4148@vkoul-mobl> <4fabb135-6fbb-106f-44fd-8155ea716c00@linux.intel.com> <20200311063645.GH4885@vkoul-mobl> <0fafb567-10e5-a1ea-4a6d-b3c53afb215e@linux.intel.com> <20200313115011.GD4885@vkoul-mobl> <4cb16467-87d0-ef99-e471-9eafa9e669d2@linux.intel.com> <20200314094904.GP4885@vkoul-mobl> <3c32830c-cd12-867f-a763-7c3e385cb1e9@linux.intel.com> <20200320153334.GJ4885@vkoul-mobl> <70d6e0cb-22a6-5ada-83a8-b605974bdd84@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70d6e0cb-22a6-5ada-83a8-b605974bdd84@linux.intel.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ranjani Sridharan , Hui Wang , broonie@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, jank@cadence.com, slawomir.blauciak@intel.com, Sanyog Kale , Bard liao , Rander Wang X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 20-03-20, 11:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > On 3/20/20 10:33 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 16-03-20, 14:15, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It's really down to your objection to the use of 'struct driver'... For ASoC > > > > > support we only need the .name and .pm_ops, so there's really no possible > > > > > path forward otherwise. > > > > > > > > It means that we cannot have a solution which is Intel specific into > > > > core. If you has a standalone controller you do not need this. > > > > > > A 'struct driver' is not Intel-specific, sorry. > > > > We are discussing 'struct sdw_master_driver'. Please be very specific in > > you replies and do not use incorrect terminology which confuses people. > > > > Sorry a 'struct sdw_master_driver' IMHO is. As I have said it is not > > needed if you have standalone controller even in Intel case, and rest of > > the world. > > You're splitting hair without providing a solution. > > Please see the series [PATCH 0/5] soundwire: add sdw_master_device support > on Qualcomm platforms > > This solution was tested on Qualcomm platforms, that doesn't require this > sdw_master_driver to be used, so your objections are now invalid. I have given you a solution which you dont like. I have asked you to talk to your colleagues at Intel, I have not heard back. I cant do anymore than this. testing on QC boards doesnt make sense, the contention is 'sdw_master_driver' which doesnt get used. I have said earlier, will say again, if you drop this piece I am ready to apply the rest of the patches. -- ~Vinod