From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094A5C433DF for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 17:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ADEA20691 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="H81gKuKm"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QcmALxhA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1ADEA20691 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DABDF1660; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:31:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz DABDF1660 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1591723962; bh=K0BGTYODR/iV0wXVelqhnKL30cXjlfOcm9U6wurUmVk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=H81gKuKmZvhoj3K39I31pZV9oWBgS79EpeOOsc2L4qN6t8L+22ydaunr7w4n3Aeun iHQLKrOEcj/2B2xirhHHsKkP+2PMzrx7g1LNfZpRxIGW+6ZcBFJzW8kcHQcnKH8LAe JIi7Sdl/jZ+IA/lWLrblJ4jhLu+Pf0pgnbkfqr4o= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80399F80278; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id AE814F8028C; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:31:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47312F80124 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:31:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 47312F80124 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QcmALxhA" Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B35E20774; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 17:31:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591723905; bh=K0BGTYODR/iV0wXVelqhnKL30cXjlfOcm9U6wurUmVk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QcmALxhAjslUXnR6YC7eg8kryfNAJrhmSweugHk354NYxFsktyjtrsT4HD1rk4dsQ 3Xegf9abdCNTeo8ST5RgTYxBtK/l7h8TBi7Yc+O2qwb3pwHDDS3Eum+Wgt4XvB4eVk w2Ll9jFjOhQHwgavtiCkF4P5PDyOgcBaq8D0Nqjg= Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:31:43 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Dan Murphy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: tas2562: Add firmware support for tas2563 Message-ID: <20200609173143.GN4583@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200609172841.22541-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200609172841.22541-2-dmurphy@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nRwNdQxTdQ7rZk9A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200609172841.22541-2-dmurphy@ti.com> X-Cookie: Be careful! Is it classified? User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: robh@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --nRwNdQxTdQ7rZk9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:28:40PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > Add a property called firmware-name that will be the name of the > firmware that will reside in the file system or built into the kernel. Why not just use a standard name for the firmware? If the firmwares vary per-board then building it using the machine compatible (or DMI info) could handle that, with a fallback to a standard name for a default setup. --nRwNdQxTdQ7rZk9A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl7fx34ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B4Pgf/ehxijrs0I1XM6a7jjZd7I2o0Qr+iNYOZ2FZzlvfc/ctItyP+oleKNvu0 Z+7bX/9Qz0KlfxABFmoUxik3859oNIASDdnZ9uPC7damLes7HkxLmixASJRcEyJT cMUPqPVVu2SYP8g5Zl4wDJKFBdg9vpsm7yUT/DJWEgwOS9MRXfM72rnxl5mgqN27 mF77C5XHmIJu/kUg1g+KMjEBpwY7iTBWfDXLecGikn+egcUdRnx2NMDQegDN9AuI 51ClUyGEYBsKX4KN1i4S1VdVA9db0Sd/Bsfkv2AS431i435xbfJSRZ40AUYFyWPJ kasHwah+rBUXN1Ue9hukXgdCrO3T3w== =JKgl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nRwNdQxTdQ7rZk9A--