From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53939C433DF for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6F6221E2 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="L0kltriU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j0ZHWYAW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BB6F6221E2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1609F11C; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 16:31:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 1609F11C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1596810752; bh=46Q+0+jZwF0wfJ5v40XvJY3v1uf1QkAJYn5NMafKPLE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=L0kltriUM1LcHiyVAsjmYtRET4gDpWp/JUsjtKB0zCX/QK9NLLF8gfA3i5mVMrIkA MW9c7rPwUlN29Vj7y4K5qNyN+X4wWzHgK+J9r7w3kATiyethMdXffJoq1TLwtxmRDh evmUKKTbFPUg7CR1PclG9yviecf6uvLIl1YC0rNI= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B130F8020B; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 16:31:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 0B1F1F80218; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 16:31:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720C4F800AB for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 16:31:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 720C4F800AB Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j0ZHWYAW" Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92CD9221E2; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:31:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596810686; bh=46Q+0+jZwF0wfJ5v40XvJY3v1uf1QkAJYn5NMafKPLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=j0ZHWYAW91IQbQriKpJIXGat/sFckD/PfMek+xcKJ6Pmz1RwmIQCYYAweWimL0GM4 VnW090s9T+pK65MNy3DTvh0LNXwq7uDJFvIKGZVCpkuVqKrHGJCHWQ0obkkEC/c+RJ k54ZoqYxwa2XPpdJ5WQ+tjYj/0aAq9++gsMYRYgM= Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:31:01 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Sit, Michael Wei Hong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: sound: intel,keembay-i2s: Add channel-max property Message-ID: <20200807143101.GL5435@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200730055319.1522-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com> <20200730055319.1522-5-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com> <20200730112948.GB5055@sirena.org.uk> <20200803104917.GB4502@sirena.org.uk> <20200804115019.GA5249@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8SdtHY/0P4yzaavF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Disposable, use only once. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: "pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com" , "Rojewski, Cezary" , "Shevchenko, Andriy" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "Sia, Jee Heng" , "tiwai@suse.com" , "liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com" X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --8SdtHY/0P4yzaavF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 06:21:14AM +0000, Sit, Michael Wei Hong wrote: > > Are you *sure* that's the only difference, or is that just the only > > difference you know about right now? > Yes, I am fairy sure that is the only difference according to the design, as per the platform use case. It would still be safer to have a separate compatible, it wouldn't be the first time that additional changes that the hardware people had failed to communicate were discovered. Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much easier to read and reply to. --8SdtHY/0P4yzaavF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8tZaQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CI6Qf+NWrfyvrDCxBzOaQ5PNVZO0sowhT2nHBp4vMvoTNOIu14rGMTv1iHbI8P 9xGacSTERvHgOC2GfgLwycaYs5JEDCg9MU0Hgwxq9wTmqlVliOWPPD8S0oxcL+Lz wtgFZ1qN5L6RX/K81Enxuj2D3MFBxAvNlu9lsXW/IYaLTX4m8dlvflTK6thJk6vN 6DTTDI95ronTQH9yJx8IlXID1aHfqnhOdBL1iokrdCivq3e7hEQQWWv2vcpEjtx2 O9/kezY3dbwnqQW6GqyKQg64dp0Ys1CLQSHJUoQT9ImSARUloKHlgjIHWXIS5Ftb aDH2n/V4SRuJ6X3dXA6LVwXIpHITEA== =kYXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8SdtHY/0P4yzaavF--