From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F320C433DF for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D4E20738 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="Axp2puN+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BdGkNHmL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 19D4E20738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926101727; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:29:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 926101727 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1597732218; bh=zBw9hFO+H66X4Rr03LngM7OaVXF0mK9y8qCEVNvyBVw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Axp2puN+ETB/VfbnEjkd9JjaOWHLK+9DRqXQaipf76HnRlhGplxkn6B+f3kkmjRdy vyUfYHtBM6y8cFECMaVDzXiSZBdeOhAfPRhj8rOO+TpR4NA1gZf2nrrtiX1be7Zr5I 0M1+4OB1TN63E4DCAsU8Lz4yM3h1LkxUDWkwCPfg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B96F80273; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:29:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 732D1F80279; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:29:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEFFF800D3 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:29:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz DEEFFF800D3 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BdGkNHmL" Received: from localhost (unknown [122.171.38.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B24B20825; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:29:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597732159; bh=zBw9hFO+H66X4Rr03LngM7OaVXF0mK9y8qCEVNvyBVw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BdGkNHmLk2pD8vhckIj7kQXtI+aSrPKhj9pKMOHnMPS+QaPuN8td+x1ZzXfkOMgaz Sb7XmZP1K4Y2i/7naBcfrKZXcR6wL2fzwmNgf9zTHsy2e1knLwsWsAJCa7SVWm3vvC EkVIEdHbsKHoDTlzVRmPuqctTDKnKWBq0nx1oz/0= Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:59:15 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] soundwire: intel: add power management support Message-ID: <20200818062915.GT2639@vkoul-mobl> References: <20200721203723.18305-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> <20200817120841.GQ2639@vkoul-mobl> <093dcb7d-e2b7-b568-6a23-aeaf9bfb6004@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <093dcb7d-e2b7-b568-6a23-aeaf9bfb6004@linux.intel.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, hui.wang@canonical.com, broonie@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, jank@cadence.com, mengdong.lin@intel.com, slawomir.blauciak@intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com, Bard Liao , rander.wang@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 17-08-20, 11:10, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > I had applied except 3 & 9 (few skipped in middle due to conflict while > > > applying), BUT I get a build failure on patch 2 onwards :( > > > > > > drivers/soundwire/intel_init.c: In function ‘sdw_intel_cleanup’: > > > drivers/soundwire/intel_init.c:72:4: error: implicit declaration of > > > function ‘pm_runtime_disable’ > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > >     72 |    pm_runtime_disable(&link->pdev->dev); > > > > > > I suspect due to missing header? I was on x64 build with allmodconfig > > > > > > So only patch 1 is applied and pushed now > > > > I just tried on these series applied on top of soundwire/next > > > > commit 9b3b4b3f2f2af863d2f6dd65afd295a5a673afa2 (soundwire/next) > > > >     soundwire: intel: Add basic power management support > > > > And I don't see any issue? > > Sorry, I misunderstood the issue. Yes indeed the #include > is added to the wrong patch, I see Bard fixed this in > our tree. Not sure what happened here, I ran a patch-by-patch compilation > test a long time ago and kbuild was silent. Thanks for spotting this. > > > If you want to double-check merge issues, I pushed the code here: > > https://github.com/plbossart/sound/tree/sdw/pm_runtime_soundwire_next > > > > I am really not sure what conflicts you are referring to, git am worked > > fine for me, only skipped the first patch that's already applied. > > But the point about conflicts does remain, I am not sure why you skipped > patches, I have no merge conflicts on my side. As noted above, I tried to apply except 3 & 9 due to questions on them. It is quite normal that dependencies fail to apply, not sure why you are confused. -- ~Vinod