From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3D3C43461 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13FB020738 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="TXFZHag1"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QTnUp1OQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 13FB020738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97ED91674; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:29:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 97ED91674 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1599586227; bh=2KdALZvMJPP90+O28CbIyTSmiZgiWwNHhCsY/b3oXMc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=TXFZHag171cgBxWKTuKFZgXhCPNTF2O48YHTc6dzJ4AhMQQPZVhSU3X4cg7WoXZXV T830hzvOgsp2XeHF74cFJDS8OhAKbGe/XYC/LTqlhRuKp+/YrDp4wMwhUJ+/Bkkovf dTotB+3r/rETYpDY6/3Nm6R9Z1h9FLvQ3HSFrdOs= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE6BF801F2; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:29:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 0AB12F80264; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:29:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659C9F800FD for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:29:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 659C9F800FD Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QTnUp1OQ" Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5FC720738; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:29:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599586164; bh=2KdALZvMJPP90+O28CbIyTSmiZgiWwNHhCsY/b3oXMc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QTnUp1OQzwTE/HPjQ6HAPnY3aTtqsGGDDezYekfkH6jZvURXfhXr9qzCr6JVGl3tR ImWPYfb4OXelvn8HJEaxuJnBTvbhlmk7U4hsysD5bf+Thl0QTGPRnn985Xb+p8DDV1 OIzZmr9183aXo+t9/8m5g+dYDM4fgF4N1ZuoacMA= Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:28:40 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] topology: use inclusive language for bclk Message-ID: <20200908172840.GH5551@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200903201024.1109914-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200903201024.1109914-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200908143504.GD5551@sirena.org.uk> <70a2012f-aa8b-52db-7694-592677d7171c@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70a2012f-aa8b-52db-7694-592677d7171c@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: Vini, vidi, Linux! User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:41:34AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 9/8/20 9:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:39:13AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > It's absolutely 100% compatible by design. > > > I was planning to update the kernel uapi header to align changes, but the > > > volume of code is much lower on the alsa-lib side. Will resubmit with the > > > preferred provider/consumer wording. > > It's binary compatible but it'd break the build for any existing code > > using the UAPI headers. > Sorry, I don't fully get the comment. Aren't the uapi headers copied into > each software tree that relies on them? Yes, it's just a question of how disruptive an update ends up being for people - if hardly anyone is using it and they know about the change it probably doesn't matter that much. --vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl9Xv0cACgkQJNaLcl1U h9A8Wgf6At4I48xbXaC1wIvQ2DxYN3zaTDfEJaCg3Izj53VpaO08rtjLFTZph1Ot qQkBRhxcV8V4uza4HR8JcP2BHUV4CGFN7iFBu7damQnTztGcwVhmLHKrUO9jOIjQ /ugTP4OKy3CaAb3P6PeWbL9KIO+eepb2kKt7IGTq8I6Qf1HpV2K7LSZTdSdqxIpL cO3PagiCppftcug4tU7+EMNOAdUN4BWBbxnqoWMhJLH3diTw888WbRclpUveeBWy 8cwjeomax/5ub7QqLO/V2QaL4srp3kqhZRMBrqMDdgVwkDKJn+TwSfLDJauLyWZj hIeuouv54LTCOG0lfpc2hjLl9xBHNA== =pDhA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtJ+CqYNzKB4ukR4--