Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: graph card schema rework

Mark Brown
2020-11-18T21:01:18Z

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:33:45 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> This series updates Sameer's patch to repartition the graph card binding
> schema and incorporate the OF graph schema. The schema was also mixing
> card node and DAI node properties, so I've split the DAI part (the
> 'port' node) into a separate schema.
>
> There's another problem that 'frame-master' and 'bitclock-master' have
> inconsistent types of boolean and phandle. Having the properties just
> point to the local or remote endpoint within an endpoint node is kind of
> pointless. We should have gone with just boolean, but looks like we
> already have several users. MMP OLPC is the one platform using boolean,
> but it happens to work because the properties are effectively ignored
> and CPU DAI as the master is the default.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ASoC: audio-graph-card: Refactor schema
commit: e52f3f291152042f1759b2b8838e7ca24556997e
[2/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: marvell, mmp-sspa: Use audio-graph-port schema
commit: fd97ee45ec63759593b06be010a8ed395b299cce
[3/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: Refine 'frame-master' and 'bitclock-master' type
commit: 251bf658558f9feff8a92ddcde402ffa220d13b8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark