[PATCH] ASoC: pcm5102a: increase rate from 192k to 384k

[PATCH] ASoC: pcm5102a: increase rate from 192k to 384k

[gearhead]

the pcm5102a is capable of 384k, but the current code limits it to 192k.
This commit extends to 384k

Signed-off-by: gearhead <ys3al35l@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/pcm5102a.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/pcm5102a.c b/sound/soc/codecs/pcm5102a.c
index b8cfc250612c..f39f98bbc97f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/pcm5102a.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/pcm5102a.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_driver pcm5102a_dai = {
 	.playback = {
 		.channels_min = 2,
 		.channels_max = 2,
-		.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000,
+		.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_384000,
 		.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE |
 			   SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE |
 			   SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_LE
-- 
2.33.0

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: pcm5102a: increase rate from 192k to 384k

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:01:25 -0500, gearhead wrote:
> the pcm5102a is capable of 384k, but the current code limits it to 192k.
> This commit extends to 384k
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: pcm5102a: increase rate from 192k to 384k
      commit: 0beeb330300f082e8b6849a9f83d34efa2578edd

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark