From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org
Cc: cujomalainey@google.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v4] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 21:52:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427185221.28928-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
It is possible to craft a topology where sof_get_control_data() would do
out of bounds access because it expects that it is only called when the
payload is bytes type.
Confusingly it also handles other types of controls, but the payload
parsing implementation is only valid for bytes.
Fix the code to count the non bytes controls and instead of storing a
pointer to sof_abi_hdr in sof_widget_data (which is only valid for bytes),
store the pointer to the data itself and add a new member to save the size
of the data.
In case of non bytes controls we store the pointer to the chanv itself,
which is just an array of values at the end.
In case of bytes control, drop the wrong cdata->data (wdata[i].pdata) check
against NULL since it is incorrect and invalid in this context.
The data is pointing to the end of cdata struct, so it should never be
null.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi,
Changes since v3:
- Move the comment about validating data along with the code which validates the
data (checks the SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
Changes since v2:
- Drop the cdata->data check against NULL as it is not a valid test and since we
are in sof_get_control_data() the memory has been already allocated
changes since v1:
- adjust the payload size for non bytes controls by subtracting the size of the
sof_ipc_ctrl_data struct, plus add comment to note this
Regards,
Peter
sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c
index 572bcbfdb356..bc848f556b88 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
struct sof_widget_data {
int ctrl_type;
int ipc_cmd;
- struct sof_abi_hdr *pdata;
+ void *pdata;
+ size_t pdata_size;
struct snd_sof_control *control;
};
@@ -784,16 +785,26 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
}
cdata = wdata[i].control->ipc_control_data;
- wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data;
- if (!wdata[i].pdata)
- return -EINVAL;
- /* make sure data is valid - data can be updated at runtime */
- if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES &&
- wdata[i].pdata->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES) {
+ /* make sure data is valid - data can be updated at runtime */
+ if (cdata->data->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data->data;
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = cdata->data->size;
+ } else {
+ /* points to the control data union */
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->chanv;
+ /*
+ * wdata[i].control->size is calculated with struct_size
+ * and includes the size of struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data
+ */
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size -
+ sizeof(struct sof_ipc_ctrl_data);
+ }
- *size += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ *size += wdata[i].pdata_size;
/* get data type */
switch (cdata->cmd) {
@@ -876,10 +887,12 @@ static int sof_process_load(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
*/
if (ipc_data_size) {
for (i = 0; i < widget->num_kcontrols; i++) {
- memcpy(&process->data[offset],
- wdata[i].pdata->data,
- wdata[i].pdata->size);
- offset += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ if (!wdata[i].pdata_size)
+ continue;
+
+ memcpy(&process->data[offset], wdata[i].pdata,
+ wdata[i].pdata_size);
+ offset += wdata[i].pdata_size;
}
}
--
2.36.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 18:52 Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2022-04-28 3:57 ` [PATCH v4] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-05-03 15:51 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427185221.28928-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox