From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6561AC433FE for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 03:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB62C3E7; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 04:10:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz AB62C3E7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1667704280; bh=gDguuYpzrmLcYvIUDE4KRXA06mz5CtB8iz8/TU0Jomg=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=pR8/RxkvCwLT7NsgIlU7eKwY+L/VLobJDK/wJLRQjGUuoZsoNep5xbnaZRxLfoihg JrnwPVpCPG5MkPTistL+QRKxzuvgJi+LbFticXlomcwVr4rpmNjFkBgF0OPQqAYW14 iv/iHzA0O+RNA/3c+5/5zrueVUgoTj7rn4BWH/dI= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405CBF80118; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 04:10:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 55CE5F800EC; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 04:10:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from webhooks-bot.alsa-project.org (gate.perex.cz [77.48.224.242]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929BAF800EC for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 04:10:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 929BAF800EC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: GitHub issues - opened To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org In-Reply-To: <1667704224716821909-webhooks-bot@alsa-project.org> References: <1667704224716821909-webhooks-bot@alsa-project.org> Subject: [Digidesign Mbox 3] Does ucm SplitPCM add latency? Message-Id: <20221106031028.55CE5F800EC@alsa1.perex.cz> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 04:10:28 +0100 (CET) X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf issue #238 was opened from ManuLinares: https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/pull/237 I've correctly configured ucm profile, but I notice a small latency added when using UCM **vs** not using it (having the default alsa analog-surround4.0 profile) Is this the expected behavior of SplitPCM in UCM? Issue URL : https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/issues/238 Repository URL: https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf