From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
<peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
<ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
<kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>, <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Support multiple groups on the same link
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:20:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808132013.889419-10-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230808132013.889419-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
The current code checks the first device on a link and assumes
that all the other devices on the link will have the same endpoint
aggregation status and endpoint group ID.
Say for example a system looked like:
SDW0 - Amp 1 (Aggregated, Group 1), Mic 1 (Aggregated, Group 2)
SDW1 - Amp 2 (Aggregated, Group 1), Mic 2 (Aggregated, Group 2)
The current code would create the DAI link for the aggregated amps,
although it is worth noting that the only reason Mic 2 is not added is
the additional check that aborts processing the link when the device
changes. Then when processing the DAI link for the microphones, Mic
2 would not be added, as the check will only be done on the first
device, which would be Amp 2 and thus the wrong group, causing the
whole link to be skipped.
Move the endpoint check to be for each device rather than the first
device on each link.
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c
index 767c49022eae4..357946365e76f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c
@@ -1288,25 +1288,24 @@ static int get_slave_info(const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr *adr_link,
}
/* gather other link ID of slaves in the same group */
- for (adr_next = adr_link + 1; adr_next && adr_next->num_adr;
- adr_next++) {
- const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint *endpoint;
-
- endpoint = adr_next->adr_d->endpoints;
- if (!endpoint->aggregated ||
- endpoint->group_id != *group_id)
- continue;
+ for (adr_next = adr_link + 1; adr_next && adr_next->num_adr; adr_next++) {
+ unsigned int link_codecs = 0;
- if (index >= SDW_MAX_CPU_DAIS) {
- dev_err(dev, "cpu_dai_id array overflows\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- cpu_dai_id[index++] = ffs(adr_next->mask) - 1;
for (i = 0; i < adr_next->num_adr; i++) {
if (adr_next->adr_d[i].endpoints->aggregated &&
adr_next->adr_d[i].endpoints->group_id == *group_id)
- (*codec_num)++;
+ link_codecs++;
+ }
+
+ if (link_codecs) {
+ *codec_num += link_codecs;
+
+ if (index >= SDW_MAX_CPU_DAIS) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cpu_dai_id array overflowed\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ cpu_dai_id[index++] = ffs(adr_next->mask) - 1;
}
}
@@ -1369,20 +1368,15 @@ static int create_sdw_dailink(struct snd_soc_card *card, int *link_index,
j = adr_index;
for (adr_link_next = adr_link; adr_link_next && adr_link_next->num_adr &&
i < cpu_dai_num; adr_link_next++) {
- const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint *endpoints;
int _codec_index = -1;
- endpoints = adr_link_next->adr_d->endpoints;
- if (group_id && (!endpoints->aggregated ||
- endpoints->group_id != group_id))
- continue;
-
/* skip the link excluded by this processed group */
if (cpu_dai_id[i] != ffs(adr_link_next->mask) - 1)
continue;
/* j reset after loop, adr_index only applies to first link */
for (; j < adr_link_next->num_adr; j++) {
+ const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint *endpoints;
int codec_index;
u64 adr = adr_link_next->adr_d[j].adr;
@@ -1395,6 +1389,12 @@ static int create_sdw_dailink(struct snd_soc_card *card, int *link_index,
}
_codec_index = codec_index;
+ endpoints = adr_link_next->adr_d[j].endpoints;
+
+ if (group_id && (!endpoints->aggregated ||
+ endpoints->group_id != group_id))
+ continue;
+
/* sanity check */
if (*codec_conf_index >= codec_count) {
dev_err(dev, "codec_conf array overflowed\n");
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 13:20 [PATCH 01/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Printk's should end with a newline Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Remove duplicate NULL check on adr_link Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Check link mask validity in get_dailink_info Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] ASoC: intel: sof-sdw: Move check for valid group id to get_dailink_info Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Add helper to create a single codec DLC Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Pull device loop up into create_sdw_dailink Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Update DLC index each time one is added Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Move range check of codec_conf into inner loop Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Device loop should not always start at adr_index Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 11/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Allow different devices on the same link Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Simplify get_slave_info Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 20:32 ` [PATCH 01/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Printk's should end with a newline Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808132013.889419-10-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).