From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
<peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
<ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
<kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>, <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Pull device loop up into create_sdw_dailink
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:20:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808132013.889419-6-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230808132013.889419-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
The loops which fill the codec DAI link component structures are split
across create_sdw_dailink and create_codec_dai_name. This causes the
code to be rather confusing, needing to return out the function to allow
the upper loop to iterate. Remove the create_codec_dai_name helper and
pull its code up into create_sdw_dailink, this makes it more obvious
what is happening in the code. This patch makes no functional change
just hoists the code up a level.
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c | 89 +++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c
index ba4775e778072..5c154628236c7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c
@@ -1197,54 +1197,6 @@ static int fill_sdw_codec_dlc(struct device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int create_codec_dai_name(struct device *dev,
- const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr *adr_link,
- struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *codec,
- int offset,
- struct snd_soc_codec_conf *codec_conf,
- int codec_count,
- int *codec_conf_index,
- int adr_index,
- int dai_index)
-{
- int _codec_index = -1;
- int i, ret;
-
- /* sanity check */
- if (*codec_conf_index + adr_link->num_adr - adr_index > codec_count) {
- dev_err(dev, "codec_conf: out-of-bounds access requested\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- for (i = adr_index; i < adr_link->num_adr; i++) {
- int codec_index, comp_index;
- u64 adr = adr_link->adr_d[i].adr;
-
- codec_index = find_codec_info_part(adr);
- if (codec_index < 0)
- return codec_index;
- if (_codec_index != -1 && codec_index != _codec_index) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "Different devices on the same sdw link\n");
- break;
- }
- _codec_index = codec_index;
-
- comp_index = i - adr_index + offset;
-
- ret = fill_sdw_codec_dlc(dev, adr_link, &codec[comp_index],
- codec_index, i, dai_index);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- codec_conf[*codec_conf_index].dlc = codec[comp_index];
- codec_conf[*codec_conf_index].name_prefix = adr_link->adr_d[i].name_prefix;
-
- ++*codec_conf_index;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int set_codec_init_func(struct snd_soc_card *card,
const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr *adr_link,
struct snd_soc_dai_link *dai_links,
@@ -1401,8 +1353,8 @@ static int create_sdw_dailink(struct snd_soc_card *card, int *link_index,
int codec_num;
int stream;
int i = 0;
+ int j, k;
int ret;
- int k;
ret = get_slave_info(adr_link, dev, cpu_dai_id, &cpu_dai_num, &codec_num,
&group_id, adr_index);
@@ -1417,6 +1369,7 @@ static int create_sdw_dailink(struct snd_soc_card *card, int *link_index,
for (adr_link_next = adr_link; adr_link_next && adr_link_next->num_adr &&
i < cpu_dai_num; adr_link_next++) {
const struct snd_soc_acpi_endpoint *endpoints;
+ int _codec_index = -1;
endpoints = adr_link_next->adr_d->endpoints;
if (group_id && (!endpoints->aggregated ||
@@ -1427,11 +1380,39 @@ static int create_sdw_dailink(struct snd_soc_card *card, int *link_index,
if (cpu_dai_id[i] != ffs(adr_link_next->mask) - 1)
continue;
- ret = create_codec_dai_name(dev, adr_link_next, codecs, codec_dlc_index,
- codec_conf, codec_count, codec_conf_index,
- adr_index, dai_index);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ /* sanity check */
+ if (*codec_conf_index + adr_link_next->num_adr - adr_index > codec_count) {
+ dev_err(dev, "codec_conf: out-of-bounds access requested\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ for (j = adr_index; j < adr_link_next->num_adr; j++) {
+ int codec_index, comp_index;
+ u64 adr = adr_link_next->adr_d[j].adr;
+
+ codec_index = find_codec_info_part(adr);
+ if (codec_index < 0)
+ return codec_index;
+ if (_codec_index != -1 && codec_index != _codec_index) {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "Different devices on the same sdw link\n");
+ break;
+ }
+ _codec_index = codec_index;
+
+ comp_index = j - adr_index + codec_dlc_index;
+
+ ret = fill_sdw_codec_dlc(dev, adr_link_next,
+ &codecs[comp_index],
+ codec_index, j, dai_index);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ codec_conf[*codec_conf_index].dlc = codecs[comp_index];
+ codec_conf[*codec_conf_index].name_prefix =
+ adr_link_next->adr_d[j].name_prefix;
+
+ (*codec_conf_index)++;
+ }
/* check next link to create codec dai in the processed group */
i++;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 13:20 [PATCH 01/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Printk's should end with a newline Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Remove duplicate NULL check on adr_link Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Check link mask validity in get_dailink_info Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] ASoC: intel: sof-sdw: Move check for valid group id to get_dailink_info Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Add helper to create a single codec DLC Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Update DLC index each time one is added Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Move range check of codec_conf into inner loop Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Device loop should not always start at adr_index Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 10/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Support multiple groups on the same link Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 11/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Allow different devices " Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Simplify get_slave_info Charles Keepax
2023-08-08 20:32 ` [PATCH 01/12] ASoC: intel: sof_sdw: Printk's should end with a newline Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808132013.889419-6-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).