From: "Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: ams-delta: Let the core to register DAPM widgets/routes and controls
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:27:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38775722.a3iD5J98oW@barack> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110081347.57569.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Hi Janusz,
On Saturday 08 October 2011 13:47:57 Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 at 11:03:19 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Pass the DAPM widgets/routes and static controls via the
> > snd_soc_card struct to core. In this way the machine driver
> > does not need to handle the DAPM widgets/routes.
>
> Hi Peter,
> This change really simplifies things by making better use of platform
> provided functionality instead of reimplementing parts of it, but it
> breaks the intentional logic of conditionally enabling card widgets,
> controls and routes. OTOH, the negative condition here is
> tty_register_ldisc() failure, which seems hardly possible in a stable,
> correctly configured kernel. So, if you really think such conditional
> logic is no longer required in a driver which has proven its stability,
> please go on, I've tested your changes, they work for me.
I was a bit hesitant to do this change in the first place.
We can keep the current flow in the ams-delta to be on the safe side.
I'm going to send out another series for the omap platforms soon which will
keep the error handling logic of ams-delta intact.
> Otherwise, I can try to re-factor the driver code, keeping that
> conditional logic, but using it for conditional runtime assignment of
> card->{widgets,routes,controls} instead of conditionally calling
> snd_soc_dapm_{new_controls,add_controls,add_routes}(). What do you
> think?
I don't think it worth the trouble to do this.
--
Péter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 9:03 [PATCH] ASoC: ams-delta: Let the core to register DAPM widgets/routes and controls Peter Ujfalusi
2011-10-08 11:47 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-10-10 6:27 ` Péter Ujfalusi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38775722.a3iD5J98oW@barack \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox