From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:19:55 +0100 Message-ID: <3b7b24bd-4bdf-752e-1a62-cc71e9152acc@users.sourceforge.net> References: <24f8c777-1eb4-e7e7-9371-79f32700c9dc@users.sourceforge.net> <2cbef557-5f89-c630-e108-14ef2ce6b41a@users.sourceforge.net> <1547a4c2-5b70-e3a3-b482-d28c538e615c@users.sourceforge.net> <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net> <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.4]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72CF266B0F for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:20:03 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org >> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked >> in reasonable ways? > > It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that > it worked. Can this aspect vary over time? > The test result should be mentioned concisely. How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures? > You shouldn't rely on my system. Did this system get sufficient trust so far? > The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable. It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting by positive review comments from other contributors (if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes). Regards, Markus