From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: topology: Unify kcontrol removal code
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:15:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40207a2a-3f2a-bbef-74f6-9e85ced3150a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230125194649.3485731-12-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
On 1/25/23 13:46, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> Functions removing bytes, enum and mixer kcontrols are identical. Unify
they are identical because of the change in patch10.
Please clarify that this is not a cleanup removing duplicated code
that's been there forever, it's become useless as a result of the
previous patch.
> them under one function and use it to free associated kcontrols.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 48 +++++-----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> index eb49037d86ae..e66b0d9e387a 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> @@ -350,41 +350,9 @@ static int soc_tplg_add_kcontrol(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
> tplg->dev, k, comp->name_prefix, comp, kcontrol);
> }
>
> -/* remove a mixer kcontrol */
> -static void soc_tplg_remove_mixer(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
> - struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj, int pass)
> -{
> - struct snd_card *card = comp->card->snd_card;
> -
> - if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_CONTROL)
> - return;
> -
> - if (dobj->unload)
> - dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
> -
> - snd_ctl_remove(card, dobj->control.kcontrol);
> - list_del(&dobj->list);
> -}
> -
> -/* remove an enum kcontrol */
> -static void soc_tplg_remove_enum(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
> - struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj, int pass)
> -{
> - struct snd_card *card = comp->card->snd_card;
> -
> - if (pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_CONTROL)
> - return;
> -
> - if (dobj->unload)
> - dobj->unload(comp, dobj);
> -
> - snd_ctl_remove(card, dobj->control.kcontrol);
> - list_del(&dobj->list);
> -}
> -
> -/* remove a byte kcontrol */
> -static void soc_tplg_remove_bytes(struct snd_soc_component *comp,
> - struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj, int pass)
> +/* remove kcontrol */
> +static void soc_tplg_remove_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_component *comp, struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj,
> + int pass)
> {
> struct snd_card *card = comp->card->snd_card;
>
> @@ -2626,14 +2594,10 @@ int snd_soc_tplg_component_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp)
> list) {
>
> switch (dobj->type) {
> - case SND_SOC_DOBJ_MIXER:
> - soc_tplg_remove_mixer(comp, dobj, pass);
> - break;
> - case SND_SOC_DOBJ_ENUM:
> - soc_tplg_remove_enum(comp, dobj, pass);
> - break;
> case SND_SOC_DOBJ_BYTES:
> - soc_tplg_remove_bytes(comp, dobj, pass);
> + case SND_SOC_DOBJ_ENUM:
> + case SND_SOC_DOBJ_MIXER:
> + soc_tplg_remove_kcontrol(comp, dobj, pass);
> break;
> case SND_SOC_DOBJ_GRAPH:
> soc_tplg_remove_route(comp, dobj, pass);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-25 19:46 [PATCH 00/11] ASoC: topology: Fixes and cleanups Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 01/11] ASoC: topology: Properly access value coming from topology file Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 02/11] ASoC: topology: Remove unused SOC_TPLG_PASS_PINS constant Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 03/11] ASoC: topology: Fix typo in functions name Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 04/11] ASoC: topology: Fix function name Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 05/11] ASoC: topology: Rename remove_ handlers Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 06/11] ASoC: topology: Remove unnecessary forward declarations Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 07/11] ASoC: topology: Pass correct pointer instead of casting Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 15:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 08/11] ASoC: topology: Return an error on complete() failure Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] ASoC: Topology: Remove unnecessary check for EOF Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] ASoC: topology: Use unload() op directly Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 15:13 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: topology: Unify kcontrol removal code Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 15:15 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-01-27 11:12 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-27 13:38 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-27 15:09 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-25 20:15 ` [PATCH 00/11] ASoC: topology: Fixes and cleanups Ranjani Sridharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40207a2a-3f2a-bbef-74f6-9e85ced3150a@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox