From: Maggio <voloterreno@tin.it>
To: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 16:38:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4043590A.6060700@tin.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040301142317.GB6542@master.mivlgu.local>
Sergey Vlasov wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:00:41PM +0100, Maggio wrote:
>
>
>>I was just wondering if the DXS support in 1.0.X has broken the
>>DXS_SUPPORT=1 with some cards .
>>
>>I have an Abit KV7 Motherboard , and I use snd-via82xx for sound .
>>
>>I use this module from the version "0.9.8" , and I've never had any
>>problems in enabling "dxs_support=1" with the 0.9.X series of the
>>drivers , yesterday , by trying 1.0.2c and today the 1.0.3 versions of
>>the kernel modules , I've noticed that ALSA doesn't work anymore with
>>DXS_SUPPORT=1 , because the sound is garbled , and I can only use DXS
>>with DXS_SUPPORT=4 .
>>
>>What's up?
>>
>>
>
>I suspect that dxs_support=4 is really the correct value in most (if
>not all) cases. The resampling engine in VT82xx has a register for
>the source sample rate, but does not have any register to indicate
>the destination sample rate. Unless the controller snoops the AC'97
>accesses in some way, this probably means that the destination
>sample rate is fixed at 48000 Hz. I'm not sure what really happens
>when the codec is set to VRA mode in this case - probably this
>depends on quirks of a particular codec. On my ASUS A7V8X (VT8235
>and ALC650) both dxs_support=1 and dxs_support=4 seem to work
>fine...
>
>
dxs_support=4 works well for me in any cases , with 0.9.8 I don't hear
(apparently) any difference between dxs_support=1 and dxs_support=4 ,
but with 1.0.2c/1.0.3 for me dxs_support=1 is pretty unusable , because
of garbaged sound . I've just noticed that if I enable first
dxs_support=4 , and then "rmmod" the driver , and then again reloading
the driver with dxs_support=1 I get garbaged sound also with 0.9.8 .
This is very obscure to me ...
I don't anyway completly understood how NO_VRA works and what this do ,
and what you lose what using NO_VRA instead of VRA .
Thanks
Marcello
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-01 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-01 14:00 DXS broken with some cards in 1.0.X in module snd-via82xx? Maggio
2004-03-01 14:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-01 15:28 ` Maggio
2004-03-01 14:23 ` Sergey Vlasov
2004-03-01 15:38 ` Maggio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4043590A.6060700@tin.it \
--to=voloterreno@tin.it \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox