From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Marc Valin Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Quality resampling code for libasound Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:19:18 +1100 Message-ID: <46013EE6.4080006@usherbrooke.ca> References: <45D92131.50601@usherbrooke.ca> <45D99DF7.90204@usherbrooke.ca> <45D9A848.9040803@usherbrooke.ca> <45DA8CD2.1040606@usherbrooke.ca> <45DAE188.6010405@usherbrooke.ca> <45DAEBB8.70808@usherbrooke.ca> <45DB713F.9090804@superbug.co.uk> <45DC0E52.1060805@usherbrooke.ca> <45DD8329.6080809@usherbrooke.ca> <45E4E4A5.6020405@usherbrooke.ca> <45EF5FE1.5080407@usherbrooke.ca> <45FFE014.1080100@usherbrooke.ca> <45FFEAA9.4040606@usherbrooke.ca> <4600539A.2070804@usherbrooke.ca> <46012E39.3020201@usherbrooke.ca> <460135A0.20903@usherbrooke.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from idefix.homelinux.org (142.163.233.220.exetel.com.au [220.233.163.142]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3528D243F2 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:19:20 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, James Courtier-Dutton List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > Yes (not alsa-specific but less speex-specific), Outside of the spx_int* types, what are the speex-specific bits that bother you? > once if it's merged > to alsa-lib tree. (The code can't be applied to the tree as it is, > BTW, because it must be LGPL, as we discussed...) Is a COPYING file OK or do you need headers (in which case, what's the smallest header that can be added?)? > Yes, but if the code is in another tree, it's actually a fork. > Having codes that may be frequently changed in multiple places is > already a risky action from the maintenance POV, regardless of the > coding style. That's what I'd like to avoid. Then the solution would be to just copy from the Speex tree once in a while and get the fixes there first. You can always have an automated formatting tool that you run after importing a new version. Overall, I really see no reason why you'd want to modify the resampler in the first place -- other than fixing bugs, which should go in the Speex tree anyway. Jean-Marc